Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of colonial governors in 1747
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jay(Reply) 19:34, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- List of colonial governors in 1747 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Unneeded page Zack3rdbb 18:33, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. --SonicChao talk 18:45, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment there's an entire category for different years, and I believe that whatever action is taken must include all of these articles. TSO1D 20:04, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Hmm, taking a look at Category:Lists of colonial governors by year it seems there is quite the list building up here. Seems like somebody has done a lot of work. Whether or not this kind of page needs to be deleted, I don't know, but I'll need more than "Unneeded page" as an argument. FrozenPurpleCube 22:02, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Clearly part of a long series, potentially encyclopedic as it develops, let's see where it goes. Plus the modern ones are certainly legitimate and where does one draw the line date-wise? Newyorkbrad 22:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There really is no reason to remove only one part of a very long series. TSO1D 22:45, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Potentially encyclopedic but needs a lot of expansion. Let's see where this one goes. Grutness...wha? 22:58, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I've extended it a bit, BTW. Grutness...wha? 23:37, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- keep per nybrad & tso. we have lists of leaders etc per year. i'm entirely unconvinced of the utility of this whole genera of lists, but afd of one example is not place to deal with that issue. ⇒ bsnowball 14:47, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.